Good morning.
DeepSeek R1 has induced existential angst in tech circles. Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen described the release of the Chinese ChatGPT rival as
America’s Sputnik moment
. Why the drama? Because DeepSeek encapsulates a slew of fundamental conflicts inside the world of tech:
It’s the U.S. vs. China
, complete with Chinese-style censorship, as my colleague David Meyer reports. [Sorry,
TikTok
, we’ll only love you
if we get to own half
.]
It’s closed source vs. open source
. The latter
gives the public access to underlying codes and weights
so they can modify and use it themselves.
It’s expensive vs. cheap
. DeepSeek claims it took two months and less than $6 million to build its R1 AI model. President Donald Trump called the news
a wakeup call
for Silicon Valley.
It’s Big Tech vs. new tech.
So much for the assumption that you need to be a behemoth sitting atop a mountain of data centers, chips, and dollars to win at this game. Even
Microsoft
CEO
Satya Nadella says he welcomes the competition
, despite his stock taking a hit on the news, too.
It’s also us vs. them
. Don Tapscott is working on a book about
identic AI
and argues “the entire model of AI needs to be redone.” He told me yesterday: “Rather than powerful corporations owning our digital future, AI should be decentralized, open, and community-owned and controlled. This vision is increasingly within reach thanks to a co-emerging foundational technology that makes decentralization possible.”
For clarity on all this
, turn to
Fortune
AI Editor Jeremy Kahn, who argues
that we should all just relax
. While DeepSeek is shaking up the AI market, he argues “the prognostications of Nvidia’s doom may be premature.”
Contact CEO Daily via Diane Brady, diane.brady@fortune.com,
Linkedin
.
More news below.